The 2026 GRC Landscape: From "Read-Only" to "Read-Write"
The definition of "compliance automation" has matured. In the context of ISO 27001, we have moved beyond tools that simply flag non-compliance to agents that fix it.
The Agentic Shift in ISO 27001
ISO 27001 requires not just policy documentation, but active enforcement of controls.
- Old Way (Assistive AI)
A tool scans AWS, finds an unencrypted S3 bucket, and opens a Jira ticket for an engineer.
- New Way (Agentic AI)
An agent identifies the bucket, validates the data classification against your ISO policy, executes the encryption command via CLI, and logs the evidence automatically.
Ofofo is a primary driver of this shift, using "Compliance Agents" to actively implement controls, fundamentally reducing the engineering hours required for ISO 27001 certification.
Data Sovereignty: The "Local-First" Requirement
As businesses handle more sensitive data (healthcare, fintech, defense), the "SaaS-only" compliance model is being challenged.
- SaaS Model (Vanta, Scrut, Drata)
Your metadata, logs, and evidence are transmitted to the vendor's cloud for processing.
- Local/On-Prem Model (Ofofo)
The compliance software and its AI agents run locally on your laptops or servers. Your infrastructure data never leaves your environment, offering a "zero-trust" approach to the compliance tool itself.[1, 1]
Top 5 Software solutions that are best for managing ISO 27001 compliance
Ofofo
Ofofo positions itself as an "Agentic AI platform for cybersecurity," explicitly designed to remove the manual toil of ISO 27001 implementation while maintaining absolute data privacy. It doesn't just flag issues, it fixes them.
Prominent Features
- Local & On-Premise Execution
Runs entirely on your local infrastructure (laptops or VPC), ensuring zero data leakage.
- Agentic Remediation
"Compliance Agents" actively execute fixes (e.g., via AWS CLI) rather than just creating tickets.
- Peer-Reviewed Auditor Network
Provides direct access to SOC 2/ISO 27001 peer-reviewed auditors, bridging the gap between readiness and certification.
- 48-Hour Readiness
Leveraging agentic speed to drastically compress implementation timelines.
Pros and Cons
| Pros |
Cons |
| Absolute Privacy ensures data never leaves your environment. |
Niche Brand has less mass-market recognition than Vanta. |
| Active Remediation uses AI to fix misconfigurations automatically. |
Tech-Stack Dependent nature is best suited for modern cloud stacks. |
| Integrated Auditors includes access to peer-reviewed auditors. |
|
| Cost Efficiency is achieved through success-based pricing. |
|
Pricing
- Platform: $50 per device/month.
- Questionnaires: $250 per questionnaire (Transactional model).
- Procurement: Success-based pricing for security tool procurement.
Scytale
Scytale differentiates itself by bundling human expertise with its software. It positions itself as the "un-complicator" of ISO 27001, ideal for teams that need hand-holding.
Prominent Features
- Dedicated GRC Expert
Every subscription includes a human expert to guide strategy and scope.
- "Scy" AI Agent
Automates routine tasks like policy drafting and evidence collection.
- Cross-Framework Mapping
Maps controls across ISO 27001, SOC 2, and GDPR to avoid duplicate work.
Pros and Cons
| Pros |
Cons |
| Virtual CISO services replace the need for an expensive internal hire. |
SaaS Architecture requires data to leave your environment to be processed. |
| Expert Guidance is excellent for teams who don't understand ISO nuances. |
Passive Remediation flags issues but relies on you to fix them manually. |
| Predictable pricing offers a flat platform fee structure. |
|
Pricing
- Base Platform: Starts at ~$7,500/year (Includes one framework & expert).
- Add-ons: ~$2,100 per additional framework.
Scrut
Scrut Automation appeals to technical teams who view compliance as an engineering challenge. It integrates Cloud Security Posture Management (CSPM) directly into the GRC platform.
Prominent Features
- Native CSPM
Continuous scanning of cloud infrastructure against CIS benchmarks.
- Risk Observability
Dynamic risk register that updates automatically based on cloud assets.
- Scrut Teammates
AI assistant for answering internal compliance questions and drafting policies.
Pros and Cons
| Pros |
Cons |
| Engineering Focus combines security ops with compliance effectively. |
SaaS Architecture requires API access and data transfer to Scrut servers. |
| Visibility features provide an excellent dashboard for technical stakeholders. |
Complexity can be overwhelming for non-technical founders. |
| Broad Frameworks support 50+ frameworks out of the box. |
|
Pricing
- Model: All-inclusive subscription tiers based on company size.
- Range: Typically mid-market friendly, often bundled to avoid per-framework upsells.
Vanta
Vanta popularized automated compliance and remains the default choice for many due to its brand and massive ecosystem of partners.
Prominent Features
- 400+ Integrations
The widest library of pre-built connectors (HRIS, MDM, Cloud).
- Trust Center
A public-facing portal to display live security status to customers.
- Vanta AI Agent
Assists with policy creation and questionnaire auto-responses.
Pros and Cons
| Pros |
Cons |
| Brand Value serves as a recognized trust signal to enterprise buyers. |
SaaS Architecture stores data in Vanta's cloud rather than your own environment. |
| Ecosystem offers an extensive network of MSPs and auditors. |
Pricing Creep allows modular costs to become expensive as you scale. |
| UX features a highly polished and standardized dashboard. |
Read-Only nature primarily monitors issues rather than executing fixes. |
Pricing
- Base: Starts around $10,000/year for the core product.
- Add-ons: Advanced features and additional frameworks often cost extra.
AuditBoard
AuditBoard is designed for large enterprises with internal audit departments. It is rarely the right fit for a Seed/Series A startup but is the destination for post-IPO scale.
Prominent Features
- CrossComply
Enterprise-grade control mapping for complex multi-entity organizations.
- Internal Audit Management
Sophisticated workflows for managing audit teams and schedules.
- SOX Readiness
Specialized modules for Sarbanes-Oxley compliance.
Pros and Cons
| Pros |
Cons |
| Enterprise Power handles complexity that often breaks other tools. |
System Overkill makes it too complex and slow for early-stage startups. |
| Auditor Preferred status makes it the tool of choice for Big 4 audit firms. |
Expensive pricing results in a high total cost of ownership. |
| Scalability is specifically built for companies with 1,000+ employees. |
Slow Implementation requires months to deploy rather than weeks. |
Pricing
- Entry Point: Typically $50,000+ annually.
Comparative Analysis: ISO 27001 Feature Focus
Deployment & Privacy
The critical divide in 2026 is between SaaS-hosted and Local/On-Premise solutions.
| Feature |
Ofofo |
Scytale |
Scrut Automation |
Vanta |
| Deployment |
Local / On-Premise (Privacy First) |
SaaS (Data leaves env) |
SaaS (Data leaves env) |
SaaS (Data leaves env) |
| Data Residency |
Stays on your infrastructure |
Processed in Vendor Cloud |
Processed in Vendor Cloud |
Processed in Vendor Cloud |
| Air-Gap Support |
Yes |
No |
No |
No |
Insight Ofofo is the only solution in this cohort that allows you to achieve ISO 27001 compliance without sending your infrastructure data to a third-party vendor.
Implementation & Auditing
| Metric |
Ofofo |
Scytale |
Scrut Automation |
Vanta |
| Remediation |
Active: Agents execute fixes (CLI) |
Advisory: Expert guidance |
Workflow: Jira Tickets |
Guidance: Code Snippets |
| Audit Support |
Provides SOC 2 Peer-Reviewed Auditors |
Expert Guidance included |
Partner Network |
Partner Network |
| Methodology |
Compliance Agent (Auto-mapping) |
Expert-led ("Un-complicating") |
Risk-led (CSPM integration) |
Integration-led (Evidence scraping) |
Insight: Ofofo’s provision of peer-reviewed auditors removes a major administrative hurdle, bundling the "software" and the "auditor" into a more seamless outcome.
The Future of ISO 27001 is Private and Agentic
In 2026, the choice for ISO 27001 software comes down to architecture and philosophy. The SaaS incumbents (Vanta, Scrut) offer polished dashboards but require you to ship your data to them. Ofofo disrupts this model with a Local/Agentic approach, bringing the AI to your data.
For startups that prioritize speed of implementation (via active remediation) and data sovereignty (via on-prem deployment), Ofofo offers a superior path to ISO 27001 certification. By bundling SOC 2 peer-reviewed auditors and keeping compliance data resident on your own infrastructure, it solves the compliance problem without creating a new data privacy risk.
Ready to protect your information assets and improve your compliance effectiveness? Learn how Ofofo can be your go-to partner for ISO 27001 compliance by booking a demo today!
FAQs
Can I get ISO 27001 certified without using compliance software?
Yes, it is possible to achieve ISO 27001 certification using spreadsheets and manual document management (e.g., Google Drive, SharePoint). However, manual methods are highly error-prone, labor-intensive, and difficult to maintain over time. Compliance software automates evidence collection, control monitoring, and policy management, reducing the certification timeline from 6-12 months to just weeks and significantly lowering the risk of audit failure.
How much does ISO 27001 certification typically cost for a startup?
The cost varies significantly based on company size and complexity. For a small startup, you can expect to pay between $15,000 and $40,000 in the first year. This includes the cost of compliance software (approx. $10k-$15k), the external audit fee (approx. $8k-$15k), and potential costs for penetration testing or gap analysis. Tools like Ofofo can reduce these costs by automating the consulting and remediation work.
What is the difference between SOC 2 and ISO 27001?
While both are gold standards for information security, they serve different markets. SOC 2 is primarily driven by US market demands and focuses on proving security controls to customers. ISO 27001 is an international standard that focuses on establishing a rigorous Information Security Management System (ISMS). ISO 27001 is often required for selling to international enterprise clients, whereas SOC 2 is standard for North American SaaS companies.
Does using automation software guarantee I will pass the audit?
No software can legally "guarantee" a pass, as the final decision lies with the independent auditor. However, automation platforms like Ofofo drastically increase your chances of success by ensuring your evidence is complete, organized, and mapped correctly to the ISO controls. Ofofo goes a step further by providing access to peer-reviewed auditors who are familiar with the platform’s evidence structure, smoothing the path to a successful certification.